Tag Archives: Sasha K

Insurrectionary Practice and Capitalist Transformation (2005)

sasha k

 

A discussion between The Batko Group and Sasha K

This conversation began as an attempt from our side to fill in some of the blanks that the other texts in this issue of Dissident doesn’t cover completely, and to exchange ideas with one of the editors of Killing King Abacus[1], which was a prominent journal of modern insurrectionary anarchism—Sasha K.

\
Continue reading Insurrectionary Practice and Capitalist Transformation (2005)

Insurrectionary Anarchism

insurrectionaryanarchism

A collection of two of our older publications on insurrectionary anarchy. “Some Notes on Insurrectionary Anarchism” by sasha k. lays out the basic principles of insurrectionary anarchism: attack, autonomous self-organization, rejection of management, illegality, informality, the synthesis of individualism and communism, and immediacy. “Without a Trace” (from the UK publication Do or Die) echoes these ideas and elaborates upon the possibility of anonymity and generalization.

[Read][Print]

Untorelli Press

Some Notes on Insurrectionary Anarchism

somenotes

by sasha k.

From the text:

Insurrectionary anarchism is not an ideological solution to all social problems, a commodity on the capitalist market of ideologies and opinions, but an on-going praxis aimed at putting an end to the domination of the state and the continuance of capitalism, which requires analysis and discussion to advance. We don’t look to some ideal society or offer an image of utopia for public consumption.
Continue reading Some Notes on Insurrectionary Anarchism

Post-Anarchism or Simply Post-Revolution?

tumblr_m517ivDiLs1qc7pq5o1_500

sasha k

 

Saul Newman, “From Bakunin to Lacan: Anti-Authoritarianism and the Dislocation of Power” (Lexington Books, 2001, $70.00).

In “From Bakunin to Lacan,” Saul Newman claims to want to reinvent anarchism (130); in fact, he claims not only to reinvent anarchism but to surpass it in creating postanarchism. He does so, because he alleges that anarchism has a hidden authoritarianism at its foundation, the authoritarianism of an essentialized human nature.
Continue reading Post-Anarchism or Simply Post-Revolution?

“Activism” and “Anarcho-Purism”

tumblr_lr3naemJ1J1qbmgeto1_500

sasha k

 

“After Seattle” (words that launched a thousand articles) there has been much talk about how to keep “building the movement.” In “Rethinking Radical Activism and Building the Movement,” Chris Dixon adds his thoughts on the matter. After reading the article one is prompted to ask what of “activism” is rethought and what is the movement to be built? In fact, very little is rethought and a critical look at “activism” is entirely absent from Dixon’s celebratory piece. Dixon focuses his discussion around hope, a hope that he calls “critical”; unfortunately, the hope in Dixon’s article is mostly self-congratulatory and contains almost no critical reflection.
Continue reading “Activism” and “Anarcho-Purism”

Post-Anarchism or Simply Post-Revolution?

tumblr_lqr1onvplT1qdnfjio1_500

Sasha k

 

Saul Newman, “From Bakunin to Lacan: Anti-Authoritarianism and the Dislocation of Power” (Lexington Books, 2001, $70.00).

In “From Bakunin to Lacan,” Saul Newman claims to want to reinvent anarchism (130); in fact, he claims not only to reinvent anarchism but to surpass it in creating postanarchism. He does so, because he alleges that anarchism has a hidden authoritarianism at its foundation, the authoritarianism of an essentialized human nature.
Continue reading Post-Anarchism or Simply Post-Revolution?