Tag Archives: L’Encyclopedie des Nuisances

Sotto il vetriolo, l’incenso

Ladri

Nel calderone del negativo
415, Torino 2005

Nata come pubblicazione periodica, proseguita come casa editrice, la “Encyclopédie des Nuisances” porta avanti da molti anni in Francia una serrata critica alla società industriale e alle sue nocività. Le sue analisi vengono spesso associate e rimandano a quella critica radicale formulata contro «la società dello spettacolo» negli anni 60 dall’Internazionale Situazionista, di cui in un certo senso l’Encyclopédie si ritiene legittima erede. Non si può certo dire che si tratti di un millantato credito, tenuto conto che un paio di enciclopedisti hanno iniziato a farsi le ossa proprio nell’IS e che per un breve periodo l’Encyclopédie ha goduto del viatico dello stesso Guy Debord. Ma se all’inizio i riferimenti e le citazioni situazioniste abbondavano negli scritti enciclopedisti, col passare del tempo sono andati via via scomparendo. Non a caso. Infatti tutta l’attività di Semprun e compagni inciampava di continuo in una contraddizione che iniziava a risaltare sotto gli occhi di tutti e che rischiava di minare la stessa credibilità della loro opera: come è possibile criticare radicalmente la tecnologia e rifiutare ogni ipotesi di rottura rivoluzionaria (come fa l’Encyclopédie) e al tempo stesso tessere le lodi a tecnofili sfrenati nonché rivoluzionari convinti (quali furono i situazionisti)?
Continue reading Sotto il vetriolo, l’incenso

Abyss

images

L’Encyclopedie des Nuisances

A bottomless chasm, or at any rate one that cannot be plumbed, we call an abyss. What of the gulf into which this society of dispossession is plunging before our very eyes? That there may be no end to this descent, or that it may end only with the self-destruction of the human race — these are, of course, mere hypotheses, much like the famous “China syndrome” itself. The crushing presence of such a possibility, however, already sits in judgment over all human actions and governs the construction of the various “safety barriers” whereby a world at war with its own power hopes to avoid a terrifying end by surviving in an endless terror. The real question is therefore: How many Chernobyls will be needed before the truth of the old slogan “Revolution or death!” is recognized as the last word of the scientific thought of this century?

Continue reading Abyss

Abyss

tumblr_mbu6555C181qbrntno1_1280

L’Encyclopedie des Nuisances

A bottomless chasm, or at any rate one that cannot be plumbed, we call an abyss. What of the gulf into which this society of dispossession is plunging before our very eyes? That there may be no end to this descent, or that it may end only with the self-destruction of the human race — these are, of course, mere hypotheses, much like the famous “China syndrome” itself. The crushing presence of such a possibility, however, already sits in judgment over all human actions and governs the construction of the various “safety barriers” whereby a world at war with its own power hopes to avoid a terrifying end by surviving in an endless terror. The real question is therefore: How many Chernobyls will be needed before the truth of the old slogan “Revolution or death!” is recognized as the last word of the scientific thought of this century?

That the demand for life itself has now become a revolutionary programme is demonstrated, at least negatively, by the following fact: carried farther and farther into madness by the necessities of their dominance, those social forces that would once have been described as conservative are no longer concerned even with the conservation of the biological bases for the survival of the species. Quite the opposite, because they are in fact bent on the methodical destruction of those bases. The dimensions of the gulf that they are digging for us are forever being calculated and recalculated, right down to the likely speed of our descent into it, right down to the bottom line — which is, in the event, the lifespan of cesium or plutonium. For this society is mad in Chesterton’s sense: it has lost everything except its reason — everything except that abstract rationality of the commodity that is its ultimate raison d’etre, and the one that has outlasted all the others. No doubt one could find other ruling classes in history which, having lost all historical perspective beyond that of their own survival, sank into a suicidal irresponsibility; but never in the past has a ruling class been able to press such vast means into service of such a total contempt for life.
Continue reading Abyss