A few days after my conviction by the 3 member Felony Appellate and the 25 years sentence imposed on me for incidents that I only nknow about from television, I think that some questions of an existential nature ad some conclusions of a capital nature emerge.

Beginning from the questions therefore, emerges the conundrum of how a person, such as the Chairman of the Court, whom even letting him run a rural café’ would be too risky, could have such authority in has hands. How can it be that the same person with the same nefarious naivete he tried my case with, could have tried and convicted hundreds, mayby even thousands of people and this is not a scandal. How can it be that this clearly unintelligent person holds thousands of lives in his hands. How can it be that the state is manned by such incapable people and yet we cannot organize the revolution against it. How can it be that the Prosecutor does not find it inelegant to take naps during the procedure nor even feel the need to take a look at the minutes before they are read out. Whoever watched the trial could conclude that her closing statement probably concerned another case. How can it be that those who do not consider penal justice a shame of humanity, but a ‘service’.
Continue reading QUESTIONS OF AN EXISTENTIAL NATURE AND CONCLUSIONS OF A POLITICAL NATURE CONCERNING THE OUTCOME OF THE TRIAL. (2014) →